<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Overlapping</title>
		<link>http://economicpolitics.forumotion.net/overlapping-f30/-t1.htm</link>
		<description></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:54:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Globalization</title>
			<link>http://economicpolitics.forumotion.net/overlapping-f30/globalization-t6.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
			<description>The globalization argument is one that I doubt will ever be agreed on. There's the morality argument, the argument for peace and tolerance, the argument for freedom, the argument for neo-colonization, and the argument for isolationism. 



The most difficult thing about this issue, however, is how abstract it actually is. All arguments are based on stereotypes and theory. While these theories are very well explained, they're not fact, and have not been proven or even disproven. 



One theory  ...</description>
			<category>Overlapping</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:54:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://economicpolitics.forumotion.net/overlapping-f30/globalization-t6.htm#6</comments>
			<guid>http://economicpolitics.forumotion.net/overlapping-f30/globalization-t6.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>